Die bekanntesten Programme zum Musikmachen

Рекомендую программу FORTE http://www.fortenotation.com/ Приложение рассчитано как на профессиональных музыкантов, аранжировщиков, композиторов, музыкальных педагогов, так и на новичков, например, на учеников детских музыкальных школ, только делающих свои первые шаги в мире музыке. Для этого реализовано несколько версий FORTE, в том числе и бесплатная базовая программа для знакомства и работы с основными функциями. Программа позволяет записывать, редактировать, оформлять и распечатывать нотные листы. Даже в базовой версии предлагается более 100 инструментов на выбор. http://www.fortenotation.com/en/transaction/downloads/ Интерфейс приложения выполнен на английском языке, но интуитивно очень понятен, так как разработан при активном участии самих музыкантов.

Thank you for this interesting article. I am an enthusiastic user of Finale 2012. Dragged kicking and screaming from the relatively simple NoteWorthy, I have not regretted the transfer. Not being a "computer-head" it was not easy in the beginning, but it's hard to imagine using anything else now. I have been using Adobe Audition, in its various versions, for many years now, and am quite happy with it.

Frankly, I am amazed that "Notation Composer" is not mentioned on this site. Is it that you are not aware of it, or do you have some kind of bias towards those programmes you have chosen to list? If you are wanting to be seen as informative.....you need to not only be aware of all software is available for Composers, you need to expose it. I could not afford to buy Finale or Sibelius and was delighted when I found Notation Composer. Sure I had looked at both of those programmes running, and as a self taught musician, admittedly lacking the musical knowledge and skills of those well taught in such things, found both of them kind of daunting and not very intuitive.....at least to my way of thinking. Notation Composer on the other hand costs very little in comparison to either of the others mentioned here. It has an interface that makes for easy interaction and understanding as to the functions available. I heartily recommend it for anyone who has the ability to create music and knows basic music theory.

Very useful information for those who are beginning to apply music software. There is a big choice of music programmes for different purposes. And there is no universal programme, which would be appropriate for all occasions. As for me, I prefer Finale to other notation software. I use Finale 2010 for 3 years, and in general, I am satisfied with it. I would advice the beginners, whatever music programme you chose, you should explore carefully all options which the programme offers. That would make your life easier and save a lot of time in future.

I use Finale 2011 for publishing my music and to compose on. Then, I export to a MIDI file and import into ProTools to get the sampled sounds I want for my movie soundtracks. I use FinalCut Pro 7 to edit and synchronize the music to the video soundtracks. I use a program called Transcribe for my music transcribing business. It only works on the MAC. I loved Audition for music editing but haven't upgraded to the MAC version since switching to MAC in 2009.I used to work as a freelance writer so I got free music software then wrote articles comparing one with the other. That was fun. When I recorded my latest CD I added live music to many of my tracks. You can listen to the results at my website at www.EdwardsMusicSite.com You can see my Finale scores at http://garyedwards.musicaneo.com

Cody - regarding instrument sound quality in MuseScore - I installed it on my Mac just over a year ago, out of curiosity. It came with only piano sound on it - whatever instrument was indicated just came out sounding like a piano! In order to get a more full range of sounds from it, it was necessary to download and instal a MIDI sound set - the manual suggested three, so I duly downloaded the one which had the smallest file sizes, in order not to take up too much disc space....so maybe if you installed a different sound set you could get better results? It may be worth a try.

i use musescore myself but would love to try finale i just need to sell some pieces to get it first its a little pricy. I have been very pleased with musescore, the main problems i run into with it is instrument sound quality. Also, some of the percussion instrument , temple block in specific, dont have the optioin to right all four notes they only give you 2 when it should be 4.

I use Sibelius for composing, recently upgraded to version 7 - it does everything I want from a notation programme. I also have MuseScore, which I installed mainly through sheer curiosity - for a free programme it really is excellent, with an interface rather similar to Sibelius (prior to Sibelius 7, which has some differences from earlier versions). For anyone to whom cost is an issue, MuseScore is a god-send! Regarding sound editing - each new Mac computer comes with Garageband pre-installed; it's a rather good programme - apart from the various 'loops' which are frankly of no interest to me whatsoever, it is a basic sound recording and editing programme of good quality, capable of recording several tracks and is quite intuitive to use, the learning curve is not steep and the results from it are good. I find it is easier to use and produces better results than Audacity.

I use Notion 3 to compose my music which features the London Symphony orchestra for their instrumentation. It really sounds authentic and it is fairly easy to use. It comes with a set of standard instrumental sounds which are very common with additional add-ins you can purchase for a reasonable fee. I would highly recommend them if you already know how to write music, and want to hear what it sounds like. All of my compositions are done using this and I have 3 out and available for purchase if you want to hear what the software sounds like.

Ich benutze z. Zt. das Programm Logic 5.0 . So viel ich weiß, gibt es dieses Programm nicht mehr. Aber von allen bisher verwendeten Programmen war und ist es mir das liebste. Mit nur ganz winzigen Einschränkungen kann ich einen kompletten Notensatz erstellen und mit allen meinen Geräten kombinieren und so die gesamte klangliche Ausdrucksmöglichkeit verwirklichen.

I use mainly Finale (currently on version 2010) - the Garritan-based electronic previews are often quite good (although not always), but the main problem is that, if I use instruments which are outside the Garritan instrumentation range, I have to make compromises - that being said Finale is not really designed as a sequencer programme - its forte is as a notation software, in which it excels, in my opinion. For those occasions when I need a little bit extra on my electronic previews I have used various programmes (after exporting the midi file from Finale) - Cakewalk (now known as Sonar) of course and also, inside it, a little known but rather nice sound producing programme called Synful (its violin solo sound is brilliant). I am always umming and ahhing about my priorities - if I give too much emphasis to electronic previews it suggests that I am not expecting a live recording in the near future, but I always hope that an electronic preview will result in one eventually!